Re: leim-list.el and registering input methods

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:

> Is there a reason that input methods are not registered in the dumped image?
> Instead they are registered at run time, even in batch mode: 

For those having their own input methods.  They can have
their own leim-list.el in somewhere in the load-path.

But, I think there's no reason to search these directories:

/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/url/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/textmodes/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/progmodes/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/play/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/org/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/nxml/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/net/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/mh-e/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/mail/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/language/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/international/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/gnus/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/eshell/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/erc/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/emulation/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/emacs-lisp/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/calendar/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/calc/
/usr/share/emacs/23.1/lisp/obsolete/

So...

> Currently there's a search for leim-list.el in load-path (see the strace
> log in my original message).
> Shouldn't this search be more restricted, like what we do for
> site-start.el and default.el?

I agree.  But, we must also search the directories added to
load-path by users.

---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden