[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: save-excursion again
|
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
|
Subject: |
Re: save-excursion again |
|
Date: |
Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:34:50 +0900 |
Stefan Monnier writes:
> > Well, ditto. I'm really unclear on why with-current-buffer is always
> > an appropriate substitute for (save-excursion (set-buffer fu-boofer)
> > ...),
>
> That's an easy one: it's *not* always an appropriate substitute.
Stefan's in a frisky mood; *don't* tag anything stable today!
- Re: save-excursion again,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=