[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ? |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:29:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:
> Maybe is my hideous English, but as explained on my original message <>
> is giving me problems with some tool.
The only difference between <> and "" is that the latter first searches
in the same directory as the containing file, before any -I directories.
Since for an out-of-src build config.h is never found in the source
directory this should not make any difference in practice.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, (continued)
- Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/07/27
- Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, Jan Djärv, 2010/07/28
- Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/07/28
- Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, Jan Djärv, 2010/07/28
- Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/07/28
- Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, Jan Djärv, 2010/07/28
- Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, immanuel litzroth, 2010/07/28
- Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, Jan Djärv, 2010/07/28
- Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/07/28
- Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/07/28
- Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/07/28
Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/07/29
Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, Andreas Röhler, 2010/07/28
Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, Yavor Doganov, 2010/07/28
Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/07/28