Re: Windows 64 port

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Cc: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>,  Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>,  AJMR 
> <address@hidden>,  address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:38:04 +0100
> 
> > Maybe I'm too naive but if x is unsigned, I don't expect to
> > see -x . The implicit semantics for unsigned is x >= 0.
> 
> -x is well defined for any value of unsigned integer type.

Perhaps so, but using that obfuscates the code, so it's undesirable if
it can be avoided.  That's what Fabrice's comments boil down to, no
more no less.