[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eww
From: |
John Williams |
Subject: |
Re: eww |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Aug 2013 08:39:10 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110017 (No Gnus v0.17) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
> John Williams <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> John Williams <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> But when I say "M-x eww RET http://www.gnu.org RET" I get a totally
>>>> blank buffer.
>>>
>>> I don't get a blank buffer. Have you compiled your Emacs with libxml
>>> support?
>> Yes, AFAICT.
>
> [...]
>
>> Does Emacs use -lxml2? yes
>
> Hm. So that should be OK, then. And since it pops you to the eww
> buffer, then it means that it got a response.
>
> You just get a blank buffer? No error messages? `(setq debug-on-error t)'
> gives you no backtrace?
Nope, nothing. Here is the entire contents of the *Messages* buffer
after stating a new session and immediately saying `M-x eww RET RET',
i.e. visiting "https://duckduckgo.com/html/?q=" :
-------------------
Loading /home/john/.recentf...done
Could not deduce mode name from keymap name [8 times]
For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a.
Package assoc is obsolete!
Contacting host: duckduckgo.com:443
gnutls.c: [1] Note that the security level of the Diffie-Hellman key exchange
has been lowered to 256 bits and this may allow decryption of the session data
-------------------
Is the message about assoc being obsolete relevant?
Lars, thank you so much for your help. I know how busy you are and I
really apreciate you taking the time to help me!
Cheers,
John
- Re: eww, John Williams, 2013/08/01
- Re: eww, John Williams, 2013/08/01
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/01
- Re: eww, John Williams, 2013/08/01
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/02
- Re: eww,
John Williams <=
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/03
- Re: eww, John Williams, 2013/08/04
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/04
- Re: eww, John Williams, 2013/08/04
- Re: eww, John Williams, 2013/08/06
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/06
- Re: eww, Richard Stallman, 2013/08/02
- Re: eww, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/08/03