[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Notes mode
From: |
Jambunathan K |
Subject: |
Re: Notes mode |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Aug 2013 10:47:48 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
> So if somebody has tried notes-mode, please share your thoughts.
Ok, for the benefit of a modern user who is familiar with Oddmuse - It
is much similar to "Blogging with Categories" [1]
The basic idea is this:
1. User creates a single journal file for each day.
2. Basic workflow is file and forget (for today or someday)
A journal entry for a single date can have different topics emacs,
perl etc adhoc notes, emacs, perl etc.) all in the SAME file. Each
topic goes in to an outline entry. [2]
3. One can "collect" entries on a given topic but from different dates
in to a single buffer. This would give a subject based journal. [3]
----------------------------------------------------------------
[1] http://www.oddmuse.org/wiki/Blogging_With_Categories
[2] The essential difference with Oddmuse is in this part. With Oddmuse
one generates 3 Journal pages for 3 topics, but with notes mode one
creates a /single/ Journal file for all 3 topics.
[3] Think of Oddmuse's Webpage for that Category.
Klaus Zeitler <address@hidden> writes:
> I've been using notes-mode since 1998. I use it at work and at home for all
> sorts of things I want to keep track. Sort of external memory :-).
> It's one of the 2 packages I always install with emacs (the other one is
> bbdb).
> Very stable and also really easy to use. Select a descriptive subject and
> scribble a note, that's it. Also has encryption (I use it for my
> passwords).
I am really surprised to hear a long-time (upwards of decades) user of a
not so well-known and (the then unbundled) package. [4]
> Over the years my index list has grown quite a bit and about the only feature
> I miss is some sort of 2 level indexing, i.e. group subjects together and
> collapse/expand them in the index file.
As a few hours user, I would say, do away with perl dependencies and
instead rely on etags for building the backlinks. Programmers, will at
once be home with it.
> Unfortunately I don't know anything about org-mode and planner. So I can't
> compare.
The Org mode uses single file (or few files) to rule the world.
Org-mode is for systematic and monolithic note-taking and note-making
(Think dissertations or books)
The notes-mode or wiki view is essentially a large collection of small
files. AFAIK, the existing Org-mode has no facility to "collect"
/outline content/ from a /given/ heading from multiple files in to a
single buffer. [5]
Bottomline:
-----------
Use Org-mode: If you want to build (by design).
Use notes-mode or wikis: If you want to grow.
Use Org-mode: For document production or strict time-driven workflow.
Use whatever: If you (perceive) time as an infinite resource and believe
in seasons of the moon.
----------------------------------------------------------------
[5] I came across todo-mode recently.
[5] It does collect TODO entries (just the headings not the contents) in
to an agenda buffer.
> HTH
>
> Klaus
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Notes mode,
Jambunathan K <=