[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Nov 2013 19:19:11 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Unfortunately, no. The "focus in" and "focus out" events in Emacs fire
> per frame. So alt-tabbing between Emacs frames will trigger a focus loss
> event for the origin frame and focus gain for the destination frame
Indeed, that's a problem in the current implementation, but that's not
the fault of your patch (your patch only makes the existing `focus-in'
and `focus-out' special events available via hooks, which is indeed more
convenient).
> It's not clear to me that X itself even *has* a concept of "active
> application" distinct from "frame that has input focus".
That's right: X11 has no such concept, AFAIK. So we can't avoid
receiving a FocusOut/FocusIn pair of X11 events. Hopefully, someone
will figure out how to cancel out such pairs in the C code so they don't
result in a `focus-in' and `focus-out' pair of Lisp-level events.
Stefan
- [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks, Brian Jenkins, 2013/11/17
- Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks, Bozhidar Batsov, 2013/11/17
- Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks, Brian Jenkins, 2013/11/17
- RE: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks, Drew Adams, 2013/11/17
- Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks, Brian Jenkins, 2013/11/18
- RE: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks, Drew Adams, 2013/11/18
- Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/11/19
- Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks, Bozhidar Batsov, 2013/11/19
- Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks, Brian Jenkins, 2013/11/19
- Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks, Bozhidar Batsov, 2013/11/18
Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/18
Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks, Brian Jenkins, 2013/11/18
Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks, Richard Stallman, 2013/11/18