[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:14:51 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>:
> "Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>:
> >> There is already git://git.sv.gnu.org/emacs, so there shouldn't be much
> >> to do, if any.
> >
> > Who owns that mirror?
>
> I'm maintaining the mirroring.
>
> Andreas.
As you say, there may be nothing that needs doing other than decommissioning
the bzr repo and changing documentation to point to the git one.
Are you aware of any CVS conversion artifacts that should be cleaned up? I'm
thinking of, in particular:
1. Unmerged commit cliques.
2. Out-of-place release tags.
3. Fossil CVS commit references in commit comments.
If there is any of this sort of cruft, the time to fix it is before the
git repo goes official. I have good tools for this.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., (continued)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Toby Cubitt, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Jose E. Marchesi, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Ulrich Mueller, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Mitchel Humpherys, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Sebastian Wiesner, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Fabián Ezequiel Gallina, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/02
- Apologia for bzr, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/02
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/02