|
From: | Bozhidar Batsov |
Subject: | Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. |
Date: | Thu, 2 Jan 2014 20:05:19 +0200 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>I don't insist that Emacs should stay with bzr. I chose to support
>bzr because it was still a contender at the time.
Now that RMS has dropped the bzr requirement, I propose we move to git.
ESR has graciously offered to be technical lead for such a migration.
Does anyone think we should stay on bzr, or choose a VCS other than git?
If there is significant support for a different system, then I guess we
should hold a poll. But my (tentative) expectation is that there will
be a pretty clear overall group preference for git -- I'm mainly posting
this so there's a place for people to follow up to express their
preference, so we can quickly get a sense of whether moving to git is
the obvious call for the group as a whole, not just for those of us who
have been been expressing that preference for some time.
-Karl
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |