[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:03:14 +0200 |
> From: Bastien <address@hidden>
> Cc: Joakim Verona <address@hidden>, Karl Fogel <address@hidden>, Eli
> Zaretskii <address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, Emacs
> developers <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:01:19 +0100
>
> It seems to me that this thread is taking a wrong path:
> it started as "please use Git" and continues as "please
> keep Eli."
I didn't feel it was that way. Karl asked for opinions and I provided
mine. I hope no one, including Karl, expected to hear only the YES
kind of responses. I didn't ask anyone to please me, and didn't say I
will stop working on Emacs if it did switch.
> Maybe Eli if you could suggest an alternative to bzr
> (that is not Git, which you hate) people would be open
> to your suggestions?
I don't see the need. Either we switch to git or we don't, it's that
simple. No one will switch to anything else.
> I for one would be open to using another dVCS as long
> as it makes current contributors happier and allows to
> get more contributions.
As someone else said, git sucked all the oxygen there was, so here we
are. As for more contributions, I hope you are right, but I have my
doubts.
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., (continued)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., joakim, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Juanma Barranquero, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Bastien, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David Engster, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Tom, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David Engster, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Bastien, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Antonio Nikishaev, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Barry Warsaw, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Karl Fogel, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Ted Zlatanov, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Karl Fogel, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/01/02