[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apologia for bzr
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: Apologia for bzr |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:12:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> I think getting new blood into emacs devel is critical or we might find
>> ourselves in the same situation as bzr a few years later.
>
> I agree about the need, but have my doubts about the results. We've
> heard similar arguments for switching from CVS, too. I hope I will be
> proven wrong.
Switching from CVS to a dVCS was a good move (I think you agreed with
this on previous posts on this ml.) But, if you wished to attract users,
choosing a tool that requires from almost everybody to learn it for the
sole purpose of contributing to Emacs was most unfortunate. Emacs would
be better off with CVS on this regard.
- Re: Apologia for bzr, (continued)
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Nathan Trapuzzano, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Nathan Trapuzzano, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Leo Liu, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, David Kastrup, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Josh, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/03
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Karl Fogel, 2014/01/03