[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Jan 2014 23:11:23 +0200 |
> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 21:37:08 +0100
>
> > I invoked 'make' from the Bash that was installed by msysgit. That
> > 'make' hang. The same command runs just fine from the MSYS Bash I use
> > for configuring and building packages. That's a fact. I think I know
> > the reasons, but if you want to disagree and live dangerously, that's
> > fine by me.
>
> IIUC you invoked MSYS `make' from MSYSGit `bash'. As I said multiple
> times, that's not expected to work.
Right, and that's why I keep the two segregated. That was all I was
saying from day one: it's a PITA to have two similar, but incompatible
environments. E.g., I cannot build a package from the same shell
where I "git pull" it.
> >> It would be quick enough to run some common git commands from MSYS shell
> >> to see if it works: clone, pull, status, log...
> >
> > I already tried, see above.
>
> No, you didn't. As git.exe does not depend on MSYS.dll, the problems you
> experienced with `make' shouldn't happen. And, indeed, invoking MSYSGit
> git.exe from a MSYS terminal worked fine for the commands I mentioned
> above.
Until that git.exe invokes a sub-command that needs Bash or Perl, and
will then invoke its own Bash pr Perl that need an incompatible
msys.dll (and other DLLs, like libiconv).
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., (continued)
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., David De La Harpe Golden, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03