[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apologia for bzr
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Apologia for bzr |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jan 2014 03:14:56 +0900 |
Eric S. Raymond writes:
> An important difference is that git porcelain is rather a shambles
> compared to Emacs Lisp - usable, but ugly and sharp-edged.
Yeah, but in computer time Elisp is to git as David is to Jesus: the
great^24-grandfather. That's a bit of an unfair comparison. When
Emacs was git's age, its extension language was TECO and when you
typed C-g in a minibuffer it laughed at you and refused to quit!
- Apologia for CUA mode, (continued)
- CUA mode???, Joshua Judson Rosen, 2014/01/04
- Re: CUA mode???, Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/04
- Re: CUA mode???, Xue Fuqiao, 2014/01/05
- Re: CUA mode???, Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/05
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Tom, 2014/01/04
- Apologia for CUA mode (was: Apologia for bzr), Christophe Poncy, 2014/01/04
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/05
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/05
- Re: Apologia for bzr,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/05
- Re: Apologia for bzr, David Kastrup, 2014/01/05
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/01/05
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/05
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Gabriel Beauchamp, 2014/01/05
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Yuri Khan, 2014/01/05
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/05
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Tom, 2014/01/05
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/06
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/06