[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dealing with local patches - mercurial queues over bzr/git checkout
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: dealing with local patches - mercurial queues over bzr/git checkout |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jan 2014 15:27:41 -0500 |
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 12:09 -0800, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> Mercurial's artificial distinction between branches and other kinds
> of change groupings is one of the things I dislike most about the
> system. I feel strongly that git got it fundamentally right and
> Mercurial got it fundamentally wrong.
I agree that MQ was a mistake in hg. Git has made mistakes too, like
submodules. However, just as git has fixed submodules with subtrees,
we also have better modern alternatives to MQ, such as Evolve. In git,
without something like Evolve instead we have,
http://www.infoq.com/news/2013/11/use-the-force/
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: dealing with local patches - mercurial queues over bzr/git checkout, (continued)
Re: dealing with local patches - mercurial queues over bzr/git checkout, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/06
Re: dealing with local patches - mercurial queues over bzr/git checkout, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/01/06
Re: dealing with local patches - mercurial queues over bzr/git checkout, Daniel Colascione, 2014/01/06
- Re: dealing with local patches - mercurial queues over bzr/git checkout,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=