[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Git transition checklist
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Git transition checklist |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2014 20:52:33 +0200 |
> From: Achim Gratz <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 19:45:20 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
> > If I run the above git command in the Emacs git repo, I get this:
> >
> > $ git describe --tags
> > mh-e-8.5-4522-gaa5ae3b
> >
> > I doubt that we want this. We want the git sha1 value of the last
> > commit instead, I think.
>
> With annotated release tags, you should drop the --tags option and only
> the annotated tags are considered:
>
> .../emacs> git tag --annotate emacs-24.3-ann emacs-24.3
> .../emacs> git describe
> emacs-24.3-ann-5712-g478ff9c
I still don't see why not use 'git log' for this purpose. We don't
want a description of the branch, we want the ID of the last commit on
which the build is based. Using that, one can easily identify what
was in the tree.
- Re: Git transition checklist, (continued)
Re: Git transition checklist, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/08
Re: Git transition checklist, Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/08
Re: Git transition checklist, Achim Gratz, 2014/01/08
Re: Git transition checklist, Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/08
Re: Git transition checklist, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/08
- Re: Git transition checklist, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/08
- Re: Git transition checklist, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/08
- Re: Git transition checklist, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/08
- Re: Git transition checklist, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/08
- Re: Git transition checklist, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/09
Re: Git transition checklist, David Kastrup, 2014/01/08
Re: Git transition checklist, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/08