[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: preferring mercurial
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: preferring mercurial |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:08:00 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>:
> > all the pro and cons of both tools, we must admit that the sole thing
> > that really remains is that git is popular:
>
> Of course. That's the whole reason for the change. If it weren't for
> that, we'd stick to Bzr which serves us fine for Emacs's trunk.
Furthermore, the Mercurial fans bitching about this seem to forget that
in the original post where I pushed for the change to git that *I prefer
Mercurial myself*. Yet I use git, because the advantages of being part
of the largest and most active ecosystem outweigh the technical benefits
of Mercurial.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: preferring mercurial, (continued)
- Re: preferring mercurial, Tim Visher, 2014/01/09
- Re: preferring mercurial, Rüdiger Sonderfeld, 2014/01/09
- Re: preferring mercurial, François Orieux, 2014/01/09
- Re: preferring mercurial, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/10
- Re: preferring mercurial, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/10
- Re: preferring mercurial,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: preferring mercurial, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/01/10
- Re: preferring mercurial, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/10
- Re: preferring mercurial, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/01/10
- Re: preferring mercurial, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/10
- Re: preferring mercurial, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/11
- Re: preferring mercurial, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/01/10
- Re: preferring mercurial, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/10
- Re: preferring mercurial, David Engster, 2014/01/10
- Re: preferring mercurial, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/01/10
- Re: preferring mercurial, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/11