[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ruby-mode] Private/protected method definition layout in Ruby 2.1
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: [ruby-mode] Private/protected method definition layout in Ruby 2.1 |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:51:14 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> `private' is a method, called with the expression `def ... end`.
Ah, that makes sense.
> I believe we can also handle this in the rules-function. Add a new rule
> for (:before . "def"), see if the preceding token is one of `private',
> `public', `protected', and if so, indent to its beginning column.
If that's works, it's preferable, indeed. Especially in light of the
above (i.e. changing the parsing would be wrong).
> Can we install such a change, with either of the approaches, during the
> feature freeze?
I think it's OK, yes. We're not yet in the "regression-only" phase.
Stefan
- [ruby-mode] Private/protected method definition layout in Ruby 2.1, Bozhidar Batsov, 2014/01/15
- Re: [ruby-mode] Private/protected method definition layout in Ruby 2.1, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/15
- Re: [ruby-mode] Private/protected method definition layout in Ruby 2.1, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/01/16
- Re: [ruby-mode] Private/protected method definition layout in Ruby 2.1, Bozhidar Batsov, 2014/01/16
- Re: [ruby-mode] Private/protected method definition layout in Ruby 2.1, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/01/16
- Re: [ruby-mode] Private/protected method definition layout in Ruby 2.1, Bozhidar Batsov, 2014/01/16
- Re: [ruby-mode] Private/protected method definition layout in Ruby 2.1, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/01/16
- Re: [ruby-mode] Private/protected method definition layout in Ruby 2.1, Bozhidar Batsov, 2014/01/16
- Re: [ruby-mode] Private/protected method definition layout in Ruby 2.1, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/01/16