[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: twitter.el, anyone?
From: |
chad |
Subject: |
Re: twitter.el, anyone? |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:48:12 -0800 |
On 16 Jan 2014, at 13:16, Joel Mccracken <address@hidden> wrote:
> One "hiccup" is that Twitter-the-company has taken a semi-hostile stance
> toward twitter clients.
> Any client that wants to have access to the API needs to tread carefully.
This is a big deal for Twitter the company, since non-official
clients dont carry the advertising (i.e. revenue generation stream)
that the official clients and web site do. They havent yet shut
down private clients, and it would probably be good to convince
them not to, but theyre a public company now, so its probably harder.
~Chad
- twitter.el, anyone?, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/14
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Joel Mccracken, 2014/01/14
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Karl Fogel, 2014/01/15
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/15
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Bastien, 2014/01/15
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/16
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Vibhav Pant, 2014/01/16
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Joel Mccracken, 2014/01/16
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/01/16
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?,
chad <=
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/17
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Bastien, 2014/01/17
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/18
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Vibhav Pant, 2014/01/18
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Vibhav Pant, 2014/01/18
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/19
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Vibhav Pant, 2014/01/19
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/20
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Bastien, 2014/01/19
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Achim Gratz, 2014/01/19