[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: clang vs free software
From: |
Rüdiger Sonderfeld |
Subject: |
Re: clang vs free software |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:44:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.11.3 (Linux/3.11.0-14-generic; KDE/4.11.3; x86_64; ; ) |
On Tuesday 21 January 2014 19:00:26 Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> () Rüdiger Sonderfeld <address@hidden>
> () Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:34:10 +0100
>
> For gcc-etags to a file in etag format
> and for the other experiment a sexp.
>
> Why not write a server to which this plugin can send the hard-won
> information? The server's job is to persist all those (incoming)
> goodies in a database somewhere (say, $projroot/.static-bits.db).
> Other clients can request the subset that is interesting to them,
> e.g., for etags (re)format(ting).
>
> This architecture is HURD-friendly, too (IIUC the HURD mindset).
> GNU Serveez + Guile-PG + SMOP ... 149 lines of Scheme, max. :-D
I think at the moment it writes a file for each code file to a subdirectory in
the $projroot. This could of course be changed. But right now the project is
in a very early stage and I didn't have the time to work on it in over a year.
Regards,
Rüdiger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: clang vs free software, (continued)
- Re: clang vs free software, John Yates, 2014/01/21
- Re: clang vs free software, Rüdiger Sonderfeld, 2014/01/21
- Re: clang vs free software, joakim, 2014/01/21
- Re: clang vs free software, Rüdiger Sonderfeld, 2014/01/21
- Re: clang vs free software, joakim, 2014/01/21
- Re: clang vs free software, Rüdiger Sonderfeld, 2014/01/21
- Re: clang vs free software, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/01/21
- Re: clang vs free software,
Rüdiger Sonderfeld <=
- Re: clang vs free software, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/23
- Re: clang vs free software, David Kastrup, 2014/01/23
- Re: clang vs free software, Helmut Eller, 2014/01/23
- Re: clang vs free software, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/25
- Re: clang vs free software, Daniel Colascione, 2014/01/25
- Re: clang vs free software, Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/25
- Re: clang vs free software, David Kastrup, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Daniel Colascione, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, Lennart Borgman, 2014/01/26
- Re: clang vs free software, David Kastrup, 2014/01/26