[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: twitter.el, anyone?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: twitter.el, anyone? |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:55:20 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
My reading of the license agreement above is that using Symantec
certificates in a software creates a lot of constraints for the
developers and that these constraints are not compatible with using
them in a free software -- but I may be wrong and I will let someone
else double-check.
It can't be part of a free program, but since it isn't code, that doesn't
really matter. I think it is ok as data distributed with a free program.
I would put it in a file in etc.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, (continued)
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Bastien, 2014/01/20
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/21
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Bastien, 2014/01/21
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/22
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Bastien, 2014/01/23
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/20
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/20
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Bastien, 2014/01/20
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/21
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Bastien, 2014/01/21
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: twitter.el, anyone?, Bastien, 2014/01/23
Re: twitter.el, anyone?, David Kastrup, 2014/01/15