[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: key-binding for cycle-spacing
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: key-binding for cycle-spacing |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:09:13 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Therefore I suggest that `cycle-spacing' take the M-SPC binding
of `just-one-space', since it provides a superset of the latter's
functionality. People who do not like this can simply rebind
`just-one-space' to M-SPC.
Objections?
I will probably find it inconvenient. I sometimes type M-SPC when
there is already just one space, by force of habit.
Of course, I can rebind it -- but how many will dislike the change?
The way to find out is by _polling the users_, asking a lot of
people to try the change for a few weeks and seeing whether they
want it or not.
There is no rush about this change. Please poll the users.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: key-binding for cycle-spacing, (continued)
- Re: key-binding for cycle-spacing,
Richard Stallman <=