[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5 |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Feb 2014 23:44:14 +0900 |
Ted Zlatanov writes:
> Encryption is not an optional feature, it's a part of the security
> model (of which Emacs has very little, as a language and as a platform).
Precisely. You've just explained in two lines why you're going to
lose this battle.
Until Emacs *has* a security model, as a language or as a platform,
encryption *is* "just a feature". Without that, your best bet is to
sign on with larsi's "it's a f---ing important f---ture, g-------t!"
line.
I-don't-expect-you-to-listen-or-understand-but-may-as-well-try-ly y'rs,
- Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/02/03
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Stefan Monnier, 2014/02/03
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/02/04
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Stefan Monnier, 2014/02/04
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/02/04
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/02/05
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/02/05
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/02/05
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, andres . ramirez, 2014/02/05
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, chad, 2014/02/05
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/02/05