[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5 |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:32:41 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 08:27:19 -0800 Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
PE> Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> I am still not sure if I should use the GnuTLS API or
>> libnettle+libhogweed directly for the primitives.
PE> Using the GnuTLS API would remove Stefan's objection to the change,
PE> no? Emacs already depends on the GnuTLS API.
No, sadly, because it's new C glue code and his goal is to remove such.
Ted
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, (continued)
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/02/07
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Daiki Ueno, 2014/02/07
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/02/07
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Daiki Ueno, 2014/02/08
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/02/08
- Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Daiki Ueno, 2014/02/05
Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/02/04