[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32) |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:38:55 +0200 |
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:52:44 +0100
> Cc: Fabrice Popineau <address@hidden>, Emacs developers <address@hidden>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > In what way is this more friendly than the "official" way of invoking
> > Emacs?
>
> If no emacs instance is running, it starts emacs, waits for it to
> answer, and then connects with it as if the emacsclient had been
> successful in the first place. This is better in some cases that
> simply running emacs through -a, mostly when emacsclient is used to
> launch Emacs as editor for some app.
I understand why this is better when we indeed need the client
functionality. I was asking why is this better when just invoking
Emacs for the first time in a session, like after a system restart.
- A DOS box starting Emacs (w32), Angelo Graziosi, 2014/02/11
- Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32), Juanma Barranquero, 2014/02/11
- Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32), Dani Moncayo, 2014/02/12
- Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32), Juanma Barranquero, 2014/02/12
- Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32), Fabrice Popineau, 2014/02/12
- Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/12
- Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32), Juanma Barranquero, 2014/02/12
- Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32), Juanma Barranquero, 2014/02/12
- Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32), Fabrice Popineau, 2014/02/12
- Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/12
- Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32), Juanma Barranquero, 2014/02/12
- Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32), Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/12
Re: A DOS box starting Emacs (w32), Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, 2014/02/12