|
From: | Matt DeBoard |
Subject: | Re: SMIE |
Date: | Fri, 15 Aug 2014 21:34:16 -0500 |
On 09 Jul 2014, at 20:59, Matt DeBoard <address@hidden> wrote:I would go a step further than Stefan and say that MELPA is basically the archetype of not-fine in this domain: finding a package in MELPA means, basically "someone, somewhere, wrote some code that might do something, in some of the versions I've had at some point". Finding a package in GNU ELPA (or a handful of other elpa repositories) adds things like "this version should actually do what's written on the tin" to potentially-interesting properties like "copyrights already assigned" and "can be fixed by interested emacs maintainers".
> As regarding inclusion in GNU ELPA, I'm just a caretaker for the
> project on behalf of the Elixir-lang people, but as it's already in
> MELPA I'm sure it's fine.
I hope that helps,
~Chad
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |