Re: Contributing LLVM.org patches to gud.el

[Florian Weimer]

* Richard Stallman:

> By replacing most of GCC with non-copylefted code, they would have
> gone most of the way towards achieving the same result: to make GCC
> cease to be a reason for all sorts of companies to work on a
> compiler that always gives users freedom.

I'm pretty sure more work is still done on GCC under NDA than on LLVM,
and GCC's copyleft license may even play a role in that.

What does user freedom matter if they never even get to use the code?