[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p
From: |
Dmitri Paduchikh |
Subject: |
Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:17:17 +0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> I would like to make a suggestion. All these problems can be resolved by
>> introducing a special (dynamically bound) variable. Each call -- not only
>> interactive -- to an interactive function would rebind it to the value
>> providing all the necessary information about interactiveness of this call.
SM> That's pretty much what we do.
No. Currently, called-interactively-p "returns t if the containing function
was called by `call-interactively'." I argue that functions not having
interactive form should not have effect on return value.
- Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Dmitri Paduchikh, 2015/07/12
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Stefan Monnier, 2015/07/12
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p,
Dmitri Paduchikh <=
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Stefan Monnier, 2015/07/12
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Dmitri Paduchikh, 2015/07/13
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Stefan Monnier, 2015/07/15
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, raman, 2015/07/16
- RE: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Drew Adams, 2015/07/16
- RE: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, T.V Raman, 2015/07/16
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Richard Stallman, 2015/07/16
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Dmitri Paduchikh, 2015/07/17
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Dmitri Paduchikh, 2015/07/17
- Message not available
- Re: Brittleness of called-interactively-p, Dmitri Paduchikh, 2015/07/18