[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Clément Pit--Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Oct 2016 08:07:01 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 |
On 2016-10-08 04:23, Helmut Eller wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07 2016, Nikolay Kudryavtsev wrote:
>
>> Is there even a reason to try evolving Elisp into something else?
>
> A major pain point of Emacs Lisp is the lack of module system or other
> namespace mechanism. The prefixes all over the place make Elisp code
> quite verbose and ugly. Evolving Elisp into a language with a module
> system would be a "good thing".
The nameless package has made this much better for me :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Lars Brinkhoff, 2016/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Nicolas Petton, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/13