[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concurrency, again
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Concurrency, again |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:28:04 +0300 |
> From: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:27:39 +0000
>
> I very strongly disagree. I think "merge what we have and make it work" is
> the
> wrong approach.
(Since then, John changed his mind.)
> I agree, there should at least be some more discussion about the design we
> want.
IMO, we don't have Emacs-specific experience for such discussions. So
these discussions will most probably lead nowhere.
My suggestion is to "learn by doing", collect experience, and _then_
discuss the design issues based on that experience.
- Re: Concurrency, again, (continued)
- RE: Concurrency, again, Herring, Davis, 2016/10/20
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ken Raeburn, 2016/10/20
- Re: Concurrency, again, Paul Eggert, 2016/10/20
- Re: Concurrency, again, Alan Third, 2016/10/18
- Re: Concurrency, again, Ken Raeburn, 2016/10/19
- Re: Concurrency, again, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/18
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Concurrency, again, John Wiegley, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Stefan Huchler, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, John Wiegley, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/27
- Re: Concurrency, again, Daniel Colascione, 2016/10/27
- Re: Concurrency, again, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/10/27
- Re: Concurrency, again, Daniel Colascione, 2016/10/27