[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CEDET Merge
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: CEDET Merge |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jan 2017 21:50:25 +0200 |
> From: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:52:55 -0500
>
> > Git obviously does record the commit date, so there's no problem with
> > that rule.
>
> The commit date has no relation to "the date when the change enters the
> Emacs repository" (ie, was pushed to Savannah).
It does when you commit locally before pushing. And, as mentioned
here, there's the --date option to control that.
> If you want a recent example of this, "make ChangeLog" and look at the
> dates of "recent" concurrency entries. Some are years old.
That doesn't mean we should drop the rule, just that some people are
not always following rules.
- Re: CEDET Merge, (continued)
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/19
- Re: CEDET Merge, Karl Fogel, 2017/01/19
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/20
- Re: CEDET Merge, Stefan Monnier, 2017/01/20
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/20
- Re: CEDET Merge, Stefan Monnier, 2017/01/20
- Re: CEDET Merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge, Glenn Morris, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge, Glenn Morris, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: CEDET Merge, Paul Eggert, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/22
- Re: CEDET Merge, Paul Eggert, 2017/01/22
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/22
- Re: CEDET Merge, Edward John Steere, 2017/01/24
- Re: CEDET Merge, Edward John Steere, 2017/01/26
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/26
- Re: CEDET Merge, Edward Steere, 2017/01/27
- Re: CEDET Merge, Edward John Steere, 2017/01/27