[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `thunk-let'?
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: `thunk-let'? |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Nov 2017 12:39:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 |
On 2017-11-09 12:20, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden>
>> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 23:22:09 +0100
>>
>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Given that "lazy evaluation" seems not to be described anywhere in the
>>> ELisp manual, I think we cannot get away with "---" here, and will
>>> have to add at least something to the manual.
>>
>> Well, it's in subr-x because I'm not sure that it is yet a good idea to
>> "advertize it so loudly" as Stefan uses to say. Nothing in subr-x is
>> described in the manual.
>
> I'm not sure this should be in subr-x.el. That file is AFAIU for
> stuff used _internally_ in Emacs, which this macro isn't.
Why doesn't that macro go to ELPA first, possibly to be integrated in Emacs
proper if it's found to be useful?
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/08
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/08
- RE: `thunk-let'?, Drew Adams, 2017/11/08
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?,
Clément Pit-Claudel <=
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- RE: `thunk-let'?, Drew Adams, 2017/11/09
- Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?), Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- RE: Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?), Drew Adams, 2017/11/09
- Re: Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?), Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/10
Re: `thunk-let'?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/11/09
Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/10
Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/09