[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `thunk-let'?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: `thunk-let'? |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:34:32 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Hmm - Would it even be acceptable to make `lazy-let' and `lazy-let*' the
> only names?
I think you're over-thinking it. If I were you, I'd go with thunk-let
which doesn't need any authorization/argument, yet works well enough.
If/when it turns out to become wildly popular or unacceptably confusing,
we can add an alias and/or rename it.
My expectation is that it won't be used very often anyway, so it doesn't
need to escape the namespace of its home package.
Stefan
- Re: `thunk-let'?, (continued)
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/22
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/22
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/22
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Pip Cet, 2017/11/23
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/23
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/24
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Stefan Monnier, 2017/11/24
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/24
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Stefan Monnier, 2017/11/24
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/27
- Re: `thunk-let'?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/27
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/30
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/24
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/30
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/30
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/23
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Gemini Lasswell, 2017/11/22
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Noam Postavsky, 2017/11/22
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/22
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/22