[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problems with move_it_in_display_line_to X when tabs exist.
From: |
Keith David Bershatsky |
Subject: |
Re: Problems with move_it_in_display_line_to X when tabs exist. |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Dec 2017 11:52:33 -0800 |
The test assumes:
* The variable word-wrap is non-nil.
* The variable tab-width is 2.
* The buffer-display table entry for a tab is: [(187 . 120) (9 . 121)].
* Native line numbers are _not_ enabled.
I have a long line that wraps at the window edge and I put a space to simulate
a new word that should be wrapped to the following line. To make it easier to
read, I am using the backslash symbol (below) to signify a word-wrap with a
space at the window edge. The next line has three "x" followed by a tab and
then the word "hello-world". The STRETCH glyph is 22 pixels wide; however,
it.pixel_width is erroneously (?) reporting that it is 11 pixels wide.
I have hard-coded an emacs_abort () when it.c == '\t', which means that we have
just moved passed character 187 (aka "ยป") and we are now on a STRETCH tab-width.
Here is a link to a screen-shot of this particular issue:
https://www.lawlist.com/images/pgrowx_a.png
What would be the next step(s), please, to continue working on debugging this
particular issue?
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx \
xxx hello-world
(gdb) pgrowx glyph_row
[New Thread 0x1c0b of process 16745]
TEXT: 18 glyphs
0 0: CHAR[x] pos=1197 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
1 11: CHAR[x] pos=1198 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
2 22: CHAR[x] pos=1199 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
3 33: CHAR[0xbb] pos=1200 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 face=31 MB
4 44: STRETCH[20+16] pos=1200 w=22 a+d=16+4 face=30 MB
5 66: CHAR[h] pos=1201 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
6 77: CHAR[e] pos=1202 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
7 88: CHAR[l] pos=1203 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
8 99: CHAR[l] pos=1204 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
9 110: CHAR[o] pos=1205 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
10 121: CHAR[-] pos=1206 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
11 132: CHAR[w] pos=1207 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
12 143: CHAR[o] pos=1208 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
13 154: CHAR[r] pos=1209 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
14 165: CHAR[l] pos=1210 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
15 176: CHAR[d] pos=1211 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
16 187: CHAR[0xb6] pos=1212 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 face=26 MB
17 198: CHAR[ ] pos=0 blev=0,btyp=UNDEF w=11 a+d=16+4 MB
(gdb) print it.c
$1 = 9
(gdb) print it.pixel_width
$2 = 11
Thanks,
Keith
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
DATE: [11-29-2017 10:04:14] <29 Nov 2017 20:04:14 +0200>
FROM: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
>
> > Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:12:35 -0800
> > From: Keith David Bershatsky <address@hidden>
> >
> > I can see that X and/or HPOS are wrong when tabs are present on the current
> > line because I get superimposed letters and double of the same word
> > slightly off to the left and/or the right of where the word should be.
> >
> > HYPOTHESIS: I would venture to say that what is displayed on screen does
> > _not_ coincide with what IT reports when running move_it_in_display_line_to.
>
> Does this happen only when line numbers are displayed?
>
> In any case, your description provides a lot of details that are hard
> to reason about, because most of the code is not shown. OTOH, if
> indeed there's a bug in move_it_in_display_line_to, then presenting
> evidence for it is very simple: show a line of text and its line
> number, and then show the X and HPOS values for each tab in that line
> as calculated by move_it_in_display_line_to vs the same values in a
> displayed line. (For the latter, you can use the pgrowx command
> defined in src/.gdbinit, or manually display the values using the
> debugger.)
>
> If you do that, any mismatches between displaying a line and moving
> through it with move_it_in_display_line_to will be immediately
> apparent, and it should be easy to fix them.
- Re: Problems with move_it_in_display_line_to X when tabs exist.,
Keith David Bershatsky <=
- Re: Problems with move_it_in_display_line_to X when tabs exist., Keith David Bershatsky, 2017/12/02
- Re: Problems with move_it_in_display_line_to X when tabs exist., Keith David Bershatsky, 2017/12/02
- Re: Problems with move_it_in_display_line_to X when tabs exist., Keith David Bershatsky, 2017/12/03
- Re: Problems with move_it_in_display_line_to X when tabs exist., Keith David Bershatsky, 2017/12/03
- Re: Problems with move_it_in_display_line_to X when tabs exist., Keith David Bershatsky, 2017/12/04