[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regex.c simplification
|
From: |
Perry E. Metzger |
|
Subject: |
Re: regex.c simplification |
|
Date: |
Sat, 16 Jun 2018 15:27:28 -0400 |
On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 20:06:43 +0200 Andreas Schwab
<address@hidden> wrote:
> The problem is that none of the other regex implementations support
> a gap.
Not quite. A couple of them (say TRE) support having a mechanism to
fetch the next character rather than assuming they're present in a
flat array or what have you, which would allow for dealing with a gap
buffer.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger address@hidden
Re: regex.c simplification, Noam Postavsky, 2018/06/16
Re: regex.c simplification, Perry E. Metzger, 2018/06/16