[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Aug 2018 19:08:16 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 08:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> I don't really think we should call `C-x &' here a "prefix argument", in any
> case.
It follows the example of "C-x RET c", which runs
universal-coding-system-argument. So I see nothing wrong with the
name: we have precedence.
Or is that the "prefix" part that bothers you?
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, (continued)
- RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Drew Adams, 2018/08/04
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2018/08/04
- RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Drew Adams, 2018/08/04
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2018/08/04
- RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Drew Adams, 2018/08/04
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2018/08/05
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Drew Adams, 2018/08/04
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/04
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Richard Stallman, 2018/08/04
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2018/08/05
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Richard Stallman, 2018/08/05
- RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Drew Adams, 2018/08/05
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Howard Melman, 2018/08/06
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/08/06
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2018/08/06
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2018/08/06