[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Aug 2018 07:57:23 -0700 (PDT) |
> >> Wasn't there are a proposal at one point to do something
> >> similar for C-x 4 and C-x 5 so that there didn't have to be
> >> -other-window and -other-frame variants of so many
> >> commands?
> >> I'm not aware of such a proposal (which only means that my memory is
> > bad), but it makes sense.
>
> Indeed, that would be very nice (I don't remember such a proposal either,
> though)
Let's please not go there, in this thread. There are downsides, as well as
upsides, to such a proposal. We've discussed it before. We can discuss it again
if needed. But let's not branch this thread for such a discussion.
- RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, (continued)
- RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Drew Adams, 2018/08/04
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/04
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Richard Stallman, 2018/08/04
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2018/08/05
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Richard Stallman, 2018/08/05
- RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Drew Adams, 2018/08/05
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Howard Melman, 2018/08/06
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/08/06
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Michael Albinus, 2018/08/06
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2018/08/06
- RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp,
Drew Adams <=
- RE: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Drew Adams, 2018/08/06
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Howard Melman, 2018/08/06
- Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Stefan Monnier, 2018/08/06
Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp, Dmitry Gutov, 2018/08/08