[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bignum branch
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: bignum branch |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Aug 2018 13:30:28 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
Tom> I am somewhat inclined to pursue the approach I mentioned earlier: make
Tom> a new branch, run the renaming commands there, then cherry-pick the rest
Tom> of the bignum changes on top. Then, the final branch could be merged to
Tom> master. This would avoid a messy merge from trunk to the branch and
Tom> then back.
I see there was a push to the feature branch to fix up the *.m files for
the big renamings -- something I forgot to do. So maybe a merge from
master and then back again is preferable after all, to try a bit harder
to avoid regressing anything.
Tom
- Re: bignum branch, (continued)
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/08
- Re: bignum branch, Tom Tromey, 2018/08/08
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/08
- Re: bignum branch, Michael Albinus, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch, Stefan Monnier, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch, Tom Tromey, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: bignum branch, Tom Tromey, 2018/08/08
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/08
- Re: bignum branch, Tom Tromey, 2018/08/08
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/09
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/10
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/10
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/10
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/10
- Re: bignum branch, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/10