|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: Some vars now limited to fixnum size. |
Date: | Tue, 21 Aug 2018 11:46:21 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
Tom Tromey wrote:
It would be better to fix nthcdr so that it works on bignumsPaul> ... and I did that by installing the attached patch. I think the bytecode interpreter needs a similar update.
I don't see any problems with the Bnthcdr implementation in the bytecode interpreter, as it simply calls Fnthcdr.
Perhaps you are thinking of some other bignum problems in the bytecode interpreter? I just now took a quick look and found some problems, and fixed the ones that I found by installing the attached patch. Did I miss any?
0001-Fix-bignum-bugs-with-nth-elt.patch
Description: Text Data
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |