[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Aug 2018 20:28:50 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> ">" == Live System User <address@hidden> writes:
>> Admittedly a minor nit, but why use the name `thread-alive-p'
>> instead of `thread-live-p' in the
>> scratch/list-thread branch?
Just thoughtlessness on my part, back when.
>> This would make it similiar to `process-live-p',
>> `buffer-live-p', `window-live-p' etc for threead
>> objects.
There are a few *-alive-p functions as well. I think if I had thought
of it I would have chosen thread-live-p though.
I tend to doubt it is worth switching, but I wouldn't oppose it.
Tom
- thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?, Live System User, 2018/08/29
- Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/08/29
- Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?, John Wiegley, 2018/08/30
- Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?, Michael Albinus, 2018/08/30
- Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/30
- Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?, Michael Albinus, 2018/08/30
- Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/30
- Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?, Michael Albinus, 2018/08/31