[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Towards a cleaner build
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Towards a cleaner build |
Date: |
Fri, 17 May 2019 12:19:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> > Would it make sense instead to move it to a separate file and put that
>> > file in lisp/obsolete?
>>
>> I can do that if you think that's the right solution. But it's been
>> obsolete since 2013, so isn't it time for it to go?
>
> Moving it into obsolete is a way of making it "go", no?
But we do eventually remove obsolete stuff from lisp/obsolete too,
right? :-)
I'm just wondering whether there's a policy on these things so that I
don't have to bother you with these details -- a period of time, or a
number of releases, or something, that determines when code marked as
obsolete should be deleted from the Emacs source tree.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Re: Towards a cleaner build: arc-mode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build: arc-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build: arc-mode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build: arc-mode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/18
- Re: Towards a cleaner build: arc-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/18
- Re: Towards a cleaner build: arc-mode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/18
- Re: Towards a cleaner build: arc-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/18