[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Support for sub-second time in decoded time
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Support for sub-second time in decoded time |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:33:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> Hm, OK. But I don't see how that relates to adding a new sub-second
>> field to the output value from `decode-time'. :-)
>
> I guess nothing, except to suggest to represent the resolution
> explicitly (i.e. to avoid the ambiguity of (34 ... 5603) which could
> be 34.5603 or 34.05603 ...).
Right. That makes more sense than "the bit that would come after the
decimal point if this were floating point, which it isn't", which would
be rather awkward to work with indeed. :-/
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Support for sub-second time in decoded time, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/07/29
- encode-time vs decode-time, Stefan Monnier, 2019/07/29
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/07/30
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Andy Moreton, 2019/07/30
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/07/30
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Paul Eggert, 2019/07/30
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Paul Eggert, 2019/07/30
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/07/31
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Stefan Monnier, 2019/07/31
Re: Support for sub-second time in decoded time, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/29