Re: 7 logical-xor implementations in source tree

[Mattias Engdegård]

1 aug. 2019 kl. 01.39 skrev Basil L. Contovounesios <address@hidden>:
> 
> Thanks, LGTM except for some minor nits:

Thank you! I've fixed them all according to your suggestions, clarified a few 
more things here and there (mentioning the slight change of semantics of `xor' 
in NEWS), and attached the revised patch.

However, given that the naming and desirability of `equiv' are (amicably) 
disputed, I thought it prudent to prepare a reduced patch with `xor' only, as 
an incremental step if nothing else.

>> +(when (equiv enabled disable)
>> +  ;; Toggle state
>> +  @dots{})
> 
> [I would love to see a better and less forced example than this, BTW.]

Replaced with another example -- perhaps no better; you be the judge.

0001-Add-conditional-operators-xor-and-equiv-to-subr.el.patch
Description: Binary data

0001-Add-conditional-operator-xor-to-subr.el.patch
Description: Binary data