[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Really noninteractive
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
Re: Really noninteractive |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:20:48 -0500 |
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 14:11, <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> LI> Yes, but that's not what I want. :-) I want to say "this function call,
> LI> in this otherwise totally normal Emacs, should not prompt".
>
> Okay, so you've established that `noninteractive` only diverts "normal emacs"
> to call `read_minibuf_noninteractive()` which in turn attempts to get input
> from stdin
See, I assumed this as well after reading the prior messages of this
thread. But I just tried it out now, and it actually does not do any
diversion. I'm actually not entirely sure why, I guess changes to the
`noninteractive' variable from lisp don't reach the C level?
So the redirection of stdin only helps in the --batch case.
- Re: Really noninteractive, (continued)
Re: Really noninteractive, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/02/20
Re: Really noninteractive, Ihor Radchenko, 2020/02/20