[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes for emacs 28
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: Changes for emacs 28 |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:01:32 +0800 |
>> Beware: they are outdated (more than 10 years old, and many items in
>> our menus were changed since then). More importantly, Xah is known
>> to be violently anti-FSF/GNU, and even anti-RMS, let alone full of NIH
>> tendencies. His recommendations are rarely provided with any
>> rationale except "the current situation is silly/stupid", and should
>> therefore be taken with a grain of salt.
>>
>> That said, it is of course okay to consider the ideas that make sense,
>> but not just "because Xah said so".
> Thanks for explaining the background.
>
> If someone does look over that list, they should check to see which are
> still relevant and provide some rationale for the change.
That article is mostly reasonable, except some rants about FSF
"advertisement". I will double check with latest Emacs menu and split
the relevant suggestions from the article into separate bug reports.
Best,
Ihor
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> Could you submit that as a new bug report?
>>
>> Separate bug reports for each item or a group of related items,
>> please. Let's not have one bug report about dozens of menu items
>> unrelated to each other.
>
> Indeed, thanks for pointing that out!
>
>> Beware: they are outdated (more than 10 years old, and many items in
>> our menus were changed since then). More importantly, Xah is known
>> to be violently anti-FSF/GNU, and even anti-RMS, let alone full of NIH
>> tendencies. His recommendations are rarely provided with any
>> rationale except "the current situation is silly/stupid", and should
>> therefore be taken with a grain of salt.
>>
>> That said, it is of course okay to consider the ideas that make sense,
>> but not just "because Xah said so".
>
> Thanks for explaining the background.
>
> If someone does look over that list, they should check to see which are
> still relevant and provide some rationale for the change.
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, (continued)
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/07
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Ihor Radchenko, 2020/09/08
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/08
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Ihor Radchenko, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, tomas, 2020/09/08
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/08
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Ihor Radchenko, 2020/09/09
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Stefan Kangas, 2020/09/09
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/09
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Stefan Kangas, 2020/09/09
- Re: Changes for emacs 28,
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Eric S Fraga, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Ihor Radchenko, 2020/09/10
- Tramp defaults (was: Changes for emacs 28), Michael Albinus, 2020/09/08
- Re: Tramp defaults (was: Changes for emacs 28), Ihor Radchenko, 2020/09/08
- Re: Tramp defaults, Michael Albinus, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Ihor Radchenko, 2020/09/09
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/09
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/08
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/08