Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28"

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 11.09.2020 18:08, Arthur Miller wrote:

> > It's not a gimmick. The buffer has its own set of commands with navigation along
> > the branches of the tree.
> I am refering to the drawing itself. When it comes to using undo, I am
> sure you could feed data into helm (or other completion system) and
> have a list of branches with fuzzy completion instead of graphical image
> which probably would be as usefull or even more useful that graphical
> tree.

It's hard for me to imagine how this can work at all, much less how it 
would work better than navigation in the said tree.

> But as I said, I think the graphical representation itself is cool
> and as you describe, for some users more clear option. I just undo with
> M-x undo, in my case it is bound to C-_ and works just fine for me.

And I most of the time use the undo-tree-undo and undo-tree-redo 
commands which are more or less analogous to undo-only and undo-redo.

Using its graphical UI is indeed a somewhat rare occurrence.