[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A modern-mode?
From: |
Alan Third |
Subject: |
Re: A modern-mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:36:58 +0100 |
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:36:12AM -0400, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> The word modern has a negative meaning in that it implies that the
> rest of Emacs isn't modern -- why would users ever want to switch of
> "modern-mode" and use the un-modern Emacs?
Easy-mode as opposed to expert, obviously. ;)
Starter-mode
Familiar-mode
Familiar-defaults-easy-start-mode? ;)
--
Alan Third
- Re: A modern-mode?, (continued)
- Re: A modern-mode?, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/15
- Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/15
- Re: A modern-mode?, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/16