[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: solarized
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: solarized |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2020 23:57:34 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > And then invert it for light backgrounds?
> So you mean to develop two distinct sets of colours?
No, just one set. Then compute the inverse of the colors
in that set.
By inverse I mean, the color that is to white as color X is to black.
I don't know what formula is needed for that, but I presume someone does.
> On another note, do we really need to strictly conform with the
> 16-colour palette?
I am not sure what "need to" means. It has been pointed out, though,
that too many colors results in confusion.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Theme generator, (continued)
- Re: Theme generator (was: solarized), Richard Stallman, 2020/09/16
- Re: solarized, Protesilaos Stavrou, 2020/09/15
- Re: solarized, Praharsh Suryadevara, 2020/09/15
- Re: solarized, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/16
- Re: solarized, Protesilaos Stavrou, 2020/09/16
- Re: solarized, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: solarized,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: solarized, Gian Uberto Lauri, 2020/09/17
- RE: solarized, Drew Adams, 2020/09/17
- Re: solarized, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/18
- Re: solarized, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/18
- RE: solarized, Drew Adams, 2020/09/18
- Re: solarized, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/17
- Re: solarized, Tim Cross, 2020/09/17
- Re: solarized, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/18
- Re: solarized, Tim Cross, 2020/09/18
- Re: solarized, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/18