[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?
From: |
T.V Raman |
Subject: |
Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings? |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:58:03 -0700 |
that's an interesting perspective. Am surprized that you feel tty
users would find C-z z significantly harder than just C-z as the key
to suspend Emacs.
Stefan Monnier writes:
> > Since keybindings are a strong emotional issue, I was hoping to
> > divide and conquer the problem, i.e. first free up a new prefix key,
> > then experiment by putting a set of related commands on that key --
> > rather than chasing our tails with arguments over which key to start with.
>
> I think `C-z` is fair game in GUI but freeing it up for other uses in tty
> mode will be a very hard sell. This leaves it as "free for GUI-only
> bindings" which makes it much less useful than a true "free prefix keymap".
>
>
> Stefan
>
>
> > Stefan Monnier writes:
> > > > 1. C-z as a prefix --- at present c-z runs suspend-frame under X,
> > and
> > > > suspends Emacs on the console.
> > >
> > > Then again, `C-z` is a standard binding for `undo`. ;-)
> > >
> > > > Perhaps turn C-z into a new prefix key, and bind the above commands
> > > > to C-z z -- that gives us a whole new keymap to play with for the
> > > > future.
> > >
> > > It's true that there's some logic to use C-z, C-x, and C-c for standard
> > > prefix keys. Yet, I think this can only make sense if we have a clear
> > > idea of what kinds of bindings we'd put into this prefix.
> > >
> > > > 2. F2 is currently taken up by 2c (2column support) and perhaps
> > it's
> > > > time to recover that key, I suspect 2c is not as heavily used to
> > > > justify a common key like F2, and it would still have C-x 6
> > > > dedicated to it if we take F2 away from it.
> > >
> > > I agree that the binding of `f2` to `2C-command` can be dropped.
> > > Not sure what to bind it to instead, OTOH.
> > >
> > >
> > > Stefan
> >
> > --
> > ♉Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 🦮♉
--
♉Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 🦮♉
--
♉Id: kg:/m/0285kf1 🦮♉
- Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, (continued)
- Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/09/29
- Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, Thibaut Verron, 2020/09/30
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/09/30
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, T.V Raman, 2020/09/30
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/30
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/09/30
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?,
T.V Raman <=
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, Noam Postavsky, 2020/09/30
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, T.V Raman, 2020/09/30
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, chad, 2020/09/30
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, T.V Raman, 2020/09/30
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/09/30
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, T.V Raman, 2020/09/30
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/30
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/09/30
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, T.V Raman, 2020/09/30
- Re: Opening Up More Keymaps Re: Standardizing more key bindings?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/09/30