[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: on helm substantial differences
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: on helm substantial differences |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:38:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
>> > `rich' is a poor choice, IMO - it doesn't mean much.
>>
>> This is a reference to the package ivy-rich
>
> Might as well call it `enhanced', `special', `super',
> or `wonderful'. Does "rich" have a meaning that
> suggests something here other than "full" or "great"?
If you don't like "rich" do you think "wise" is better?
Whereas current completions are column-oriented,
completions in the proposed format are line-wise.
Re: on helm substantial differences, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/16
- Re: on helm substantial differences, Juri Linkov, 2020/11/16
- RE: on helm substantial differences, Drew Adams, 2020/11/16
- Re: on helm substantial differences, Juri Linkov, 2020/11/16
- RE: on helm substantial differences, Drew Adams, 2020/11/16
- Re: on helm substantial differences,
Juri Linkov <=
- RE: on helm substantial differences, Drew Adams, 2020/11/17
Re: on helm substantial differences, Protesilaos Stavrou, 2020/11/17
RE: on helm substantial differences, Drew Adams, 2020/11/17
Re: on helm substantial differences, Juri Linkov, 2020/11/17
Re: on helm substantial differences, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/16