[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [External] : Re: POLL: make C-x o transient
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: [External] : Re: POLL: make C-x o transient |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Jan 2021 17:49:30 +0000 |
Hello, Drew.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 17:32:48 +0000, Drew Adams wrote:
> > > Which will make `C-x o` invoke a transient version of
> > > `other-window' like `text-scale-adjust’ does.
> > I would really like to have "C-x o o o o" feature to cycle through
> > frame's windows. I think one cycling direction is enough because frames
> > don't usually have large number of windows. On the other hand even "C-x
> > o o" is much nicer than "C-x o C-x o".
> Agreed. We should bind a _repeatable_ version
> of `other-window' to `C-x o'.
I personally find even one C-x o to be an annoyance. So I've bound
other-window to F12. (My other Fn keys are for switching to frame Fn.)
> And we should consider doing likewise for
> other non-repeatable commands where it makes
> sense: give their existing bindings to
> repeatable versions.
> (You can of course already, today, use
> `C-x o C-x z z z z...'. Not a big difference
> from `C-x o o o o o': Just add a `C-x' and
> repeat `z' instead of `o'.)
That's not a small difference, either. I think most repeated commands
are going to be repeated a small number of times, like once, or possibly
twice. C-x o C-x z isn't saving anything over C-x o C-x o. By the time
you're up to C-x o C-x z z z z, you've probably already reached for the
mouse and clicked in the target window.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Jose E. Marchesi, 2021/01/25
Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Sean Whitton, 2021/01/25
Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Gregory Heytings, 2021/01/27
Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Teemu Likonen, 2021/01/31
Re: POLL: make C-x o transient, Howard Melman, 2021/01/31